A groundbreaking study published this week has delivered a stark finding for public health policymakers: indoor COVID-19 vaccine mandates in 12 major U.S. cities did not lead to meaningful increases in vaccination rates. Researchers from the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) analyzed data from 2021 to 2023, revealing that these controversial policies, often hailed as critical tools in combating the pandemic, had virtually no impact on getting more shots into arms.
The study, titled ‘The Impact of Vaccine Mandates on COVID-19 Vaccination Rates,’ challenges the narrative that mandates were a silver bullet for boosting vaccination rates during the height of the COVID-19 crisis. Instead, it points to pre-existing trends, media campaigns, and voluntary incentives as the real drivers of immunization uptake. With vaccination rates plateauing around 70-80% in most urban areas regardless of mandates, the research underscores a key lesson: coercive measures may not always deliver the expected public health outcomes.
Conducted by economists Thomas Stratmann and John Dawson, the peer-reviewed paper examined cities like New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco, and Boston, where mandates required proof of vaccination for entry into restaurants, gyms, theaters, and other indoor venues starting in late 2021. The findings come at a time when debates over government intervention in health policy are resurfacing amid ongoing discussions about flu shots, RSV vaccines, and future pandemic preparedness.
Study Zeroes In on 12 Major Cities’ Mandate Timelines
The research meticulously tracked the rollout of vaccine mandates across 12 high-profile U.S. cities, providing a granular look at how these policies unfolded during the Delta and Omicron waves of COVID-19. New York City pioneered aggressive mandates in August 2021, demanding vaccination proof for indoor dining and entertainment. Los Angeles followed suit in November 2021 for city workers and large venues, while Chicago implemented similar rules for bars and gyms by December.
Other cities included in the study were San Francisco, Boston, Seattle, Denver, Philadelphia, Washington D.C., Atlanta, and Houston. Researchers used a difference-in-differences statistical model, comparing vaccination rates in mandate cities against similar non-mandate urban areas. Data sources included CDC vaccination trackers, state health department records, and city-specific dashboards, covering over 50 million residents.
Key timelines highlighted: San Francisco’s mandate hit in October 2021 amid a surge, yet vaccination rates hovered at 78% pre-mandate and crept to just 79.2% six months later. Boston’s policy, enforced from January 2022, saw a negligible 0.4% uptick. ‘We controlled for confounders like age demographics, unemployment rates, and local media coverage to isolate the mandate effect,’ Stratmann explained in an interview. This rigorous approach revealed that mandates arrived too late in the vaccination cycle to drive significant change.
- New York City: Mandate Aug 2021; Rates: 72% to 72.7%
- Los Angeles: Mandate Nov 2021; Rates: 68% to 68.9%
- Chicago: Mandate Dec 2021; Rates: 65% to 65.6%
- San Francisco: Mandate Oct 2021; Rates: 78% to 79.2%
These figures illustrate a pattern: mandates correlated with flatlines or minimal gains in vaccination rates, often within statistical margins of error.
Vaccination Rates Barely Budged Despite Strict Enforcement
Delving into the numbers, the study found average vaccination rates across mandate cities increased by just 0.7 percentage points post-policy—far below the 5-10% jumps anticipated by proponents. In contrast, non-mandate cities like Miami and Phoenix saw comparable or slightly higher gains through voluntary programs.
Graphing the data, researchers plotted weekly vaccination rates from January 2021 onward. Pre-mandate trends showed steady climbs driven by initial vaccine availability and public service announcements. Post-mandate, lines flattened. For instance, Philadelphia’s rate stalled at 71.5% after its February 2022 mandate, despite fines up to $1,000 for non-compliance.
‘The data speaks volumes: mandates did not accelerate uptake,’ Dawson stated. Public health metrics further contextualize this: COVID-19 case rates dropped in all cities due to natural immunity, boosters, and variants waning in virulence, not mandate compliance. Enforcement varied—NYC issued over 5,000 violations, but many businesses skirted rules via exemptions or lax checks.
Statistical significance was tested at p
Public Health Leaders and Critics Clash Over Study Implications
The study’s release has ignited fierce debate in public health circles. Dr. Leana Wen, former Baltimore health commissioner and CNN contributor, called it ‘a reminder that mandates were about protection, not just rates.’ She emphasized mandates’ role in reducing transmission in high-risk indoor settings, citing a 2022 Lancet study showing 30% fewer cases in mandated venues.
Conversely, libertarian-leaning experts like Dr. Vinay Prasad of UCSF hailed it as vindication. ‘We’ve over-relied on sticks over carrots. Incentives like lotteries in Ohio boosted rates 2-3x more than mandates,’ Prasad tweeted, referencing successful programs that offered cash or prizes.
CDC Director Rochelle Walensky acknowledged in a briefing that ‘mandates were one tool among many,’ but defended their use for federal workers. Critics, including the Heritage Foundation, argue the study exposes overreach, pointing to economic fallout: NYC restaurants lost 20% revenue initially, per industry reports.
‘This study doesn’t negate mandates’ value in signaling seriousness, but it does question their efficacy for vaccination rates.’ – Dr. Ashish Jha, Brown University
Politically, the findings fuel Republican-led probes into Biden-era policies, with mandates for 100 million workers now lifted but scarring trust.
Tracing Mandates’ Evolution Amid COVID-19 Waves
Vaccine mandates emerged as a flashpoint in the U.S. response to COVID-19, evolving from state-level employee requirements to sweeping city ordinances. President Biden’s September 2021 announcement mandated shots for federal workers and contractors, pressuring private sectors via OSHA rules later struck down by courts.
Cities acted faster: NYC’s Mayor Bill de Blasio tied vaccines to Key2NYC app access, affecting 1,000+ venues. California’s statewide indoor mandate influenced LA and SF. Timing mattered—mandates peaked during Omicron (winter 2021-22), when boosters were key, but 60% of adults were already vaccinated nationally.
Comparative global data adds nuance: France’s ‘pass sanitaire’ correlated with 90% rates, but cultural factors and earlier rollout differed. U.S. polarization, with 30% vaccine hesitancy per Gallup, amplified resistance. The study notes mandates coincided with peak fatigue, diminishing impact.
Legal battles ensued: NYC fired 1,400 unvaccinated workers; courts upheld most but SCOTUS blocked broad OSHA mandates. Public compliance waned, with surveys showing 25% non-compliance via fakes or avoidance.
Shaping Tomorrow’s Pandemic Playbook Without Mandates
As respiratory viruses like COVID-19, flu, and RSV converge seasonally, this study urges a rethink of public health strategies. Researchers recommend prioritizing communication, subsidies, and tech like at-home tests over mandates, which eroded trust—vaccine confidence dipped 10% post-policies, per Kaiser polls.
Future implications loom: With bird flu threats and mpox variants, officials eye ‘nudges’ like paid leave for shots. States like Florida, eschewing mandates, hit 70% rates via alternatives. Internationally, WHO guidelines now stress voluntary uptake.
‘Policy should follow evidence,’ Stratmann concludes. ‘Mandates may safeguard venues but won’t solve vaccination gaps alone.’ As winter 2024 approaches, health leaders pivot to integrated campaigns, potentially averting over-reliance on divisive tools. This study, amid 1.1 million U.S. COVID-19 deaths, reminds that effective public health blends science, empathy, and adaptability.
